Leading

 

an olive....

 

New England Journal of Medicine published in 1981 with title “Pneumocystis’ Carinii Pneumonia and Mucosal Candidiasis in previously Healthy Homosexual Men – Evidence of a New Acquired Cellular Immunodeficiency.”, also defined as ‘...a new acquired cellular immunodeficiency’, pointing to the viruses ability to evade human immune system. It means that other forms of immunodeficiency were not unknown and not unfamiliar with Sciences. It was primarily associated with Gay (Homosexual) community, with Haitians, with Heroin users, and Hemophiliacs. The caption also throw some light on the power of early theories on a pandemic and what early theories could really do to the later studies of a virus and its pathology. The information on the spread of HIV from its early roots to the ends of the modern times has featured all sorts of interesting notes. Based on later arguments, it seems that some of the infections are not themselves caused by HIV, that the virus is considered by many experts to be slow virus not unlike bovine and visna, HIV is similar to cancer with due respect to the nature of a plaque in the cell or what essentially leads to forms of nerve wracking plaques, decay and demethylation, for that these viruses which may be classified as retrovirus and are not themselves dangerous and are essentially trapped in some restrictive enzymes where they grudgingly make all the damages.

We may consider these periods as quite important in vaccination given the proof that it was the baby versions of micro-organism proved useful in helping in human health an RNA that to human DNA is such a way that the structure of the Virus from the mature version would no longer be required. Here we paint a quick brush stroke on the early papers on this virus;

 

Dogma for HIV

•             It is translated from one person to another through blood and sexual contact showing signs of Rash, Kaposi virus – Michael Gottlieb,

•             It does not transfer from one primate to another – Sampson Onwuka

•             It is a lentivirus – it kills slowly and separate itself from oncogenic viruses because of the Interleukin 2 – Luc Montaigne

•             It is an oncogenic virus and show patterns conceivable close to a strain of cancer which seem parallel to a strain of monkey virus from Zaire - Robert Gallo

•             It is a blood Cancer comparable to the – Sampson Onwuka

•             It refrains from DNA of the host and does not have personal DNA and it has two pieces of RNA – CD4 and Retro-virus – David Baltimore

•             It is Thymus depended – a general dogma and has a tendency to use E. coli and Streptococcus

•             Its formative origins may have started differently – perhaps male to male – primary productive isolation – Sampson Onwuka

•             Vaccination is Contagious – and probably unsafe – Prophage and Age of Bacteria – Sampson Onwuka

•             People do not necessarily die from HIV, they die from opportunistic infection – general dogma -

•             HIV virus is not the only immune deficiency syndrome, auto-immune failures can be induced by drugs and 

•             Use of AZT and other drugs may be useful in decreasing the Course of the Virus and not the rest…Duesberg